Stop Losing to Wire Fees: How Stablecoins Reduce Fees

.

Many businesses still rely on wire transfers to send payments to vendors, contractors, investors, or other stakeholders. While this method is widely accepted, it often comes with costs—some of which may go unnoticed.

In some situations, stablecoins offer an alternative that could reduce these expenses while improving the speed and transparency of financial operations.

 

The Real Cost of Wire Transfers

A typical domestic or international wire transfer may include:

  • Sending fees ranging from $25 to $45

  • Intermediary bank fees, which can vary based on routing

  • Settlement delays, ranging from 1 to 5 business days

For businesses sending multiple payments per month, the total cost can be significant—particularly when paired with administrative overhead.

 

What Are Stablecoins?

Stablecoins such as USDC or WYT (Wyoming Stable Token) are digital tokens pegged to the U.S. dollar. They are typically backed by cash or short-term U.S. Treasury instruments and designed to maintain a stable value.

Because they operate on blockchain infrastructure, stablecoin transfers:

  • Are low-cost or fee-free

  • Settle within minutes, even outside of banking hours

  • Are transparent, with transactions recorded on-chain

These characteristics make stablecoins an emerging tool for modern treasury management.

 

How Some Businesses Are Using Stablecoins

Certain businesses have begun integrating stablecoins into their financial workflows, often with the goal of reducing friction or cutting transfer fees.

Examples include:

  • Construction firm: Shifted idle capital to stablecoins and used them for vendor payments, reducing costs and gaining more control over timing.

  • Investment syndicator: Distributed funds to limited partners using stablecoins to avoid wire fees and improve speed of settlement.

  • Design agency: Began paying U.S.-based contractors in stablecoins, which reduced both transfer fees and back-office work.

  • Import business: Reported operational savings and faster delivery by using stablecoins for outbound vendor payments.

These use cases reflect decisions made based on operational needs, available tools, and comfort with digital assets.

 

Considerations Before Switching

While the benefits of stablecoins can be meaningful, there are risks and tradeoffs to consider:

  • Custody: Funds are typically held by a platform or third-party wallet provider. Businesses need to evaluate who controls the assets and how redemptions are handled.

  • Regulation: The legal framework around stablecoins is evolving. Businesses should remain aware of compliance requirements, especially if operating across jurisdictions.

  • Workflow Changes: Implementing stablecoin-based solutions may require time and resources to integrate with existing systems or educate staff.

Businesses should assess these factors carefully when evaluating whether to incorporate stablecoins into their operations.

 

Conclusion

Wire transfers remain a common tool for business payments, but they can carry costs that add up over time. In some cases, stablecoins offer a faster and more cost-effective alternative, especially for repeat payments or those requiring real-time settlement.

For businesses with ongoing treasury or payment needs, this may be a space worth exploring.

 

Interested in tools that support stablecoin payments and treasury operations? Ping offers infrastructure designed to help businesses use digital dollars more effectively.

Previous
Previous

Modernizing Investor Management with Stablecoins

Next
Next

Stablecoin Treasury Tools for SMBs